25 thoughts on “University of Kentucky Cheerleading 2009 2010

  1. BuryMeInBlack1313

    @TheRobinbock Top Gun is an All Star team. Kentucky is college cheerleading, They are completely different styles of cheer.
    Kentucky did very well in my opinion, their routine was pretty flawless :]

  2. ICEathletics

    @epmx27 actually…. all star, and college cheerleading are completely different. UCA is just an association that does competition with both groupings

  3. universityofpink101

    they won right?!? if they didn’t, they should have….. 😀 UK brings it every year

  4. epmx27

    @TheRobinbock all star and uca cheerleading are COMPLETELY different. you can’t even compare the two

  5. MissShandaBaby

    @jasmineeelarae13 I understand it’s a tradition. I just asked why the same ones every year. And I never said anything about changing it, I just wanted to know why. 🙂

  6. raclip02

    @SuperTL1985 I completely agree with you, however, the score sheets at both UCA and NCA are different and the judges are looking for different things, as well. Also, the thing about UofL is that they get a set of people who are exceptionally well in stunting and a good set of people who are exceptionally well in tumbling. When you put the two together, you’ve got a powerhouse. I do agree on you with the balance part about it; everyone on UK’s team has both good tumbling and stunting.

  7. jasmineeelarae13

    @MissShandaBaby UK is all about tradition If that is what makes you win why change it. GO BIG BLUE!

  8. SuperTL1985

    @raclip02 It all depends on your perspective. I definitely think UofL is more flashy than UK but Kentucky’s difficulty is higher and the squad is more balanced. For instance, UofL’s tumbling is amazing and they throw a higher # of difficult individual passes, but I haven’t seen a routine where every member throws a full like UK. UofL throws more creative stunts (prob easier with more ppl) but the actual elite sequences aren’t as difficult and clean as UK’s and often require 2 bases.

  9. raclip02

    @cdmcw If you think about it, Louisville doesn’t compete only once a year, they’re constantly competing outside of NCA and different divisions of NCA other than Collegiate Division. That’s why I say Louisville is more legit, because they have more than one program running and they still come out on top at Worlds, Cheersport, NCA All Star Championship and Collegiate (All girl, Large and Small Coed). Kentucky only competes once. If you think about it, who’s pushing the envelope more?

  10. cdmcw

    @raclip02 thats such bullsh*t. kentucky cheerleaders are ridiculous. personally, i dont even see how the two compare. louisville is always trying to say that they’re better than kentucky at everything, but when it comes down to winning kentucky is no doubt the best. they are straight up athletes.

Comments are closed.